SFC's investigation found that during the period from December 2007 to October 2008, a managing director of Merrill Lynch had mis-marked a trading book in exotics options (Book) by manipulating the volatility marks in the valuation model, and accessed the computer system without authority to alter pricing parameters on various occasions. The mis-marking activities, which did not apply to any other books, resulted in the value of the Book being inflated by approximately US$25 million and caused the actual loss in the Book to be wrongly reported internally.
SFC found that Merrill Lynch did not have adequate internal controls procedures in place to manage the risks associated with mis-marking, in that:
- there was uncertainty as to supervisory responsibilities over the trader and the Book;
- the price verification mechanism applied to other trading books was not applied to the Book;
- there were inadequate checks and balances over the Book to mitigate operation risks including risks associated with fraud and dishonest activities;
- there was insufficient safeguard over information security and integrity as regards the Book;
- trading and valuation policies were not sufficiently implemented over the Book; and
- senior management failed to adequately manage the risks associated with the Book.
This case is no doubt a scandal in Hong Kong's risk management industry. Would the managing director and other key personnel of Merrill Lynch be personally liable?
No comments:
Post a Comment